To start, let’s examine why the Renminbi is currently on an appreciation trajectory. For this, we return to a core economic concept: GDP. While GDP has its shortcomings, it remains the most straightforward and effective metric for evaluating a nation’s overall economic health. The GDP formula is:
GDP = C + I + G + (X–M)
Where:
With this framework, the reasons behind the Renminbi’s appreciation become clear. Three primary drivers stand out:
The first advantage of a stronger Renminbi is the rapid inflow of foreign capital. Both the US and China have recently faced significant debt issues. In the US, this is reflected in federal government debt, while in China, it’s seen in local government off-balance-sheet liabilities. US Treasury bonds are widely held by foreign investors and are highly liquid, so default risk quickly impacts bond prices and the US’s ability to refinance. As a result, the US often relies on dollar depreciation to reduce the real value of its debt to foreign creditors—essentially, an “inflation tax” through rate cuts and quantitative easing. In China, most local debt is held domestically, giving authorities more options for restructuring, such as extending maturities or using fiscal transfers. Therefore, the Renminbi faces less pressure from debt dynamics. However, in both countries, high debt levels limit the ability to boost GDP through increased government spending. In this context, Renminbi appreciation is a tool to attract capital inflows and support economic growth.
A stronger Renminbi makes imported goods more affordable for domestic consumers in two key ways. First, it increases consumers’ purchasing power, especially for essential goods like food and energy, which dominate total consumption. In the near term, shoppers will notice more imported products at lower prices. Second, companies benefit from reduced costs when importing raw materials or critical components, which boosts profit margins and frees up resources for expansion or dividend distribution.
Since China posted a trade surplus exceeding $1 trillion in November, international debate over the Renminbi’s valuation has intensified, leading to greater friction in trade negotiations with major partners, especially the EU. This occurs because, in aggregate, global current accounts must balance—one country’s exports are another’s imports. When China’s surplus rises, deficits in other countries increase. In today’s environment, every country is focused on economic growth, and a widening trade deficit weighs on GDP, especially in developed economies with low growth. There are two main responses: raising tariffs (trade protectionism) or adjusting exchange rates. The former, as seen in the US-China tariff dispute, is currently paused. Allowing the Renminbi to appreciate in a controlled manner helps alleviate political friction and reduces related government expenditures.
Despite these benefits, appreciation must be gradual and orderly. Recently, the Renminbi’s rise has been pronounced, partly because year-end growth targets have been met—5.2% through Q3, which essentially achieves the annual “around 5%” goal. Allowing some appreciation now helps position the economy for next year’s transformation, enabling policymakers to monitor market dynamics and identify opportunities and risks early. Otherwise, with substantial foreign reserves, the central bank could easily stabilize the exchange rate.
Looking ahead, I expect the pace of appreciation to slow significantly. Net exports remain a crucial driver of China’s GDP, even as their contribution narrows. Rapid appreciation would shrink net exports and complicate next year’s growth targets.
With the short-term appreciation drivers clarified, let’s turn to why USDT is trading at a discount. Three main reasons stand out:
In summary, the USDT discount is likely temporary, driven by short-term supply-demand shifts. However, sustained Renminbi strength will result in exchange rate losses for Renminbi-based investors over the short and medium term.
Given the Renminbi’s appreciation, should you convert USD stablecoins to Renminbi to avoid FX losses? Unless your portfolio is heavily concentrated in USD stablecoins, a moderate adjustment is sufficient; otherwise, maintaining a diversified allocation is prudent. Here are three reasons:
How can you hedge Renminbi appreciation and FX risk on-chain? While FX derivatives would be the standard solution, on-chain access remains limited. Last year, I considered building a decentralized FX derivatives platform, but market research showed competitors, like DYDX’s foreign derivatives section, faced shallow liquidity and little market-maker interest—mainly due to regulatory constraints. FX controls are a key policy tool in manufacturing economies like China and South Korea, so FX derivatives face even stricter oversight than crypto. Most demand for FX hedging comes from these jurisdictions, which heightens regulatory resistance.
Still, there are ways to mitigate FX risk. Three asset classes are worth monitoring:
China’s top export destinations are ASEAN, the EU, and the US. Trade war pressures have reduced exports to the US, making the EU and ASEAN the main drivers of incremental growth.
ASEAN, composed largely of fast-growing developing economies, absorbs much of China’s low- and mid-end product exports and investment, and imports significant industrial equipment for upgrading. The overall economic effect is positive, and China’s growing military power has helped reduce political friction, resulting in a more stable relationship.
The EU story is different. China’s exports to the EU are more heavily weighted toward high-margin industrial goods, making Europe a key market for stablecoin trade surpluses. Most trade is settled in euros, and China has an incentive to maintain a competitive exchange rate. However, political friction with the EU must also be managed. Most EU countries are developed economies with a high share of manufacturing in GDP (15% in Europe vs. less than 10% in the US). Wage income is a larger portion of household earnings than capital gains. The loss of Russian energy has raised costs and hit manufacturing, while China’s industrial upgrading has disrupted key sectors like autos. Lower industrial profits have led to lower tax revenues and slower wage growth, reducing the wealth effect and dampening consumption. On the investment side, a lack of quality AI projects has pushed European capital to the US. As a result, net exports are even more important for European growth, and governments are highly sensitive to trade deficits.
Despite this, the EU lacks the leverage the US has shown in trade disputes, and member states are divided in their approach to China, making it difficult to secure major concessions. As a result, I expect the focus to shift toward reinvesting euro profits in Europe rather than large-scale exchange rate adjustments. Compared to emerging markets like India, Vietnam, or Brazil, Europe offers more developed capital markets and stronger investor protections. China’s ample reserves allow for reinvestment to boost returns, and stable exchange rates help Chinese goods remain competitive.
For on-chain FX hedging, a practical strategy is to convert USD stablecoins to EURC and deposit them on leading protocols like AAVE, where current lending rates reach 3.87%. If you want to maintain exposure to risk assets like BTC while hedging FX risk, you can use EURC as collateral to borrow USD stablecoins and allocate into assets like BTC.





